Service

Legacy Migration

We modernize aging, heavily customized systems without disrupting operations, migrating to modern architectures one step at a time so the business keeps running.

Three worn bound ledgers stacked beside a closed modern laptop in a shaft of daylight
Legacy Migration

What we build.

Six disciplines, from first architecture to production support.

Application re-architecture

Monoliths restructured into modern architectures without starting over.

  • Monolith to microservices
  • Desktop to web
  • Framework upgrades
  • Strangler-fig migrations
Cloud migration

On-premise workloads to Azure, AWS, or GCP with zero-downtime cutover.

  • Lift-and-shift
  • Cloud-native re-platforming
  • Hybrid architectures
  • Containerization
Database modernization

Legacy databases migrated and tuned on modern, scalable platforms.

  • Oracle and Access to SQL
  • Cloud database migration
  • Schema optimization
  • Data validation
API-first transformation

Legacy systems wrapped in modern APIs so they fit today's architecture.

  • REST layers over legacy
  • Event-driven integration
  • Gateway and security
  • Gradual replacement
ERP migration

NAV, AX, GP, Sage, and QuickBooks moved to D365 or NetSuite.

  • NAV and GP to Business Central
  • Sage and QuickBooks to D365
  • Custom ERP replacement
  • Historical data preserved
Incremental migration

Phased approaches that deliver value at every stage.

  • Phased roadmaps
  • Parallel run strategies
  • Risk mitigation
  • Rollback planning

Why Aedista

Why Aedista for modernization

Off legacy, no outage

Cut over live operations without pausing production.

Data unity, not data loss

Full reconciliation, history preserved.

We’ve run this before

NAV and GP to Business Central, legacy ERP to D365.

25 years modernizing

3,000+ projects off aging systems onto supported platforms.

Our stack

Modern tools we build with

.NET logo

.NET Core

Enterprise web and service backends

Java logo

Java

Large-scale enterprise systems

Node.js logo

Node.js

APIs and real-time services

PHP logo

PHP

High-volume web platforms

React logo

React

Modern web front ends

Angular logo

Angular

Enterprise front ends

Next.js logo

Next.js

Server-rendered React apps

Swift logo

Swift

Native iOS apps

Kotlin logo

Kotlin

Native Android apps

Microsoft Azure logo

Azure

Cloud infrastructure and DevOps

AWS logo

AWS

Cloud infrastructure at scale

Docker logo

Docker

Containerized deployment

Engagement models

Three ways to work with us

icon file

Fixed cost

A defined scope, priced upfront, and paid by milestone. Best when requirements are clear and stable.

icon graph

Time and materials

Built for evolving scope. You pay for delivered work, and priorities can shift as you learn.

icon man

Dedicated team

Our engineers work as an extension of your team, on your priorities, at your cadence.

Hands lifting a bound legacy ledger from a closed laptop during a Legacy Migration engagement at Aedista
Quote
Aedista didn't just advise, they built the system alongside us. They understood our operations, made the complex parts simple, and delivered something our teams actually use every day. The result was immediate and, more importantly, built to last.
Daniel R.
Daniel R.
Director of Operations at a Berkshire Hathaway company
Trusted by global brands
Talk to us

Modernize without the risk.

Let's plan the path.

Discuss migration
Discuss migration

Frequently asked questions

Two colleagues in conversation across a sunlit table, one listening while the other explains
What is legacy system modernization?
Legacy system modernization is the process of updating aging software, databases, and infrastructure to modern architectures and platforms while preserving the business logic and institutional knowledge embedded in the original system. It can mean re-architecting a monolithic application into microservices, migrating an on-premise system to the cloud, upgrading a database engine, or wrapping legacy functionality in modern APIs. Aedista approaches modernization as a structured process (assess, plan, migrate, optimize) rather than a risky full rewrite.
What is the strangler fig pattern and why does it matter?
The strangler fig pattern is a modernization approach where a new system is built incrementally alongside the legacy system, gradually taking over functionality piece by piece until the old system can be safely retired. Named after the strangler fig vine that grows around a host tree, this pattern lets you replace a legacy application without a risky big-bang rewrite or extended downtime. Aedista has used this approach on platforms including a 25-year medical education system, migrating page by page and module by module while the proven legacy core kept serving production.
How long does a legacy modernization project take?
Timelines vary significantly based on system complexity and approach. A focused database migration or API wrapper project can take 2 to 4 months. A phased application re-architecture using the strangler fig pattern typically spans 6 to 18 months, with new functionality shipping incrementally throughout rather than all at once at the end. Full ERP migrations from legacy platforms typically take 3 to 12 months depending on customization complexity. Aedista structures every modernization as a phased roadmap so your business sees value at each milestone, not just at a single cutover date.
How do you minimize risk during a legacy modernization?
Risk mitigation is built into every phase of our methodology. We start with a thorough assessment to map dependencies and technical debt before any code changes. We use phased migration roadmaps so failures are contained to a single module rather than the whole system. Parallel-run periods let both old and new systems operate simultaneously so your team can validate behavior before cutover. We maintain detailed rollback plans at every stage. And for application re-architecture, the strangler fig pattern means the proven legacy system keeps running in production while new functionality is built and tested alongside it.
Is it cheaper to modernize incrementally or do a full rewrite?
Incremental modernization is almost always lower-risk and often lower-cost than a full rewrite. A full rewrite requires freezing feature development on the legacy system, carries a higher risk of scope creep and budget overrun, and creates a high-stakes cutover where any gap in feature parity disrupts the business. Incremental modernization using the strangler fig pattern or phased migration lets you ship value continuously, keep the legacy system as a safety net during transition, and adjust the roadmap as you learn. We typically only recommend a full rewrite when the legacy codebase is so brittle or undocumented that incremental change is not feasible.
What legacy systems and technologies have you modernized?
Aedista has modernized systems built on virtually every generation of enterprise technology, from classic ASP and VB6 desktop applications to early-2000s .NET Framework systems, legacy ERP platforms including Dynamics NAV, Dynamics GP, and Dynamics AX, on-premise SQL Server and Oracle databases, and monolithic web applications built before microservices architecture existed. Recent examples include migrating a 25-year medical education platform's .NET Framework WebForms backend to a modern NestJS stack, and an 80+ server cloud migration with Dockerization and CI/CD for a SaaS platform serving customers for over a decade.